Pages

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Ban on Gay Marriage

To: The Brotherhood & Sisterhood
From: Frank Paul Gambino
RE: Ban on Gay Marriage
Date: 1 June 2007
Date: 26 January 2008
Date: 21 February 2008

I think that a ban on homosexual marriage is a priority, not because of morals, but because of the economic factors.

The way I understand things as far as marriage is concerned, is that whatever you believe in, you are married to. I believe when the Apostle Paul said that he wanted to present you like virgins to the Lord (unmarried), he was talking about preconceived notions. He was talking about religion. He did not want his flock to be married to possibly falsehoods, and he wanted them to be open to ideas that may be the intentions of the Lord. In other words, he did not want his flock to have preconceived notions about what was the Lords will.

If a person is a homosexual and they believe in homosexuality, they are already married to this concept. The piece of paper that makes government recognition of this union, does not make them anymore married then they already are. A marriage license only means that the government recognizes the union. This cannot happen for economic reasons.

We are in a situation whereby the government wants to overhaul the Social Security System. Probably in the near future the age of retirement will go up. When the Social Security System was first designed there were about 5 or 6 people working for everyone on Social Security. If my understanding is correct, by around 2020 there will be more like 2 or 3 people working for everyone on Social Security. The Social Security System is basically a pyramid scheme and for it to continue to work, the average worker will have to be much more productive than those who work today. People will have to do what it once took 6 people to do through technology, to supply the masses with supplies and to take care of the elderly.

If homosexual marriages are recognized by the government it will destroy the Social Security System. It will be like every other homosexual will be eligible for Social Security because their homosexual partner died from AIDS. It is for this reason that I think the Ban on Gay Marriages is a National Priority. Our Nations financial stability is on the line.

RE: Slipping Through the Cracks

I believe the nation is being side tracked and people are taking advantage of it. The shape of the United Supreme Court was reshaped without much media attention or politicians being vocal about it. Now the homosexual community is trying to slip through the cracks with their agenda, while the nation is at war and the economy is uncertain.

The real argument from the homosexual community is that they want government benefits in the same way as heterosexual couples. The issue is not about loving relationships, as it is being presented, it is about health benefits, other benefits and social security.

I think a lot of things should be addressed concurrently with this issue. I do not hear homosexuals fighting for their rights to defend our country openly as homosexuals in the military. They want the same benefits as those who fight and die for our nation, but do not want the right to be a part of that group. The trend of the media is that President Bush is dealing with an issue that is not as important as the gas prices and the war in Iraq. But the media does not mention that the homosexual community is raising the issue at this time. In other words we are supposed to just be sidetracked with all the other problems of the world and ignore these defenseless homosexuals. I do not think so! If they find it timely to raise the issue of “Gay Rights,” I believe the county should respond to this.

I do not think they deserve the right to have the government recognize their same sex unions. Maybe I will change my mind, when they fight to have a Gay Brigade in the United States Military. Maybe I will change my mind when as openly homosexuals they serve in the front line along side with the many men and women who serve and die and get injured in war. I think the media is pro-homosexual and the fight against homosexual marriage is an economic factor that cannot be ignored. If the media wants the United States to deal with what they think are the important issues, then they should tell the homosexuals to put their agenda on the backburner until the nation can have time to properly address the issues. I do not think the nation should be sidetracked with so called important issues, and ignore the homosexual agenda, that is not about loving relationships, but is about government benefits for a diseased ridden community, because of their sexual behavior.

I heard a homosexual couple say that what President Bush is doing is un-Christian, as to say their relationship is. This is the kind of mess the media is presenting to the general public. The American Citizens are being brainwashed into believing that this issue is about something that it not about. It is not about love, it is about benefits and economics and the economy is on the top of the agenda. I wish President Bush would be honest and straightforward with the American people, and tell it like it is the government cannot afford to condone homosexuality, because it would break the bank.

RE: Same Sex Marriage Scenario

This is what is on the line with same sex marriages. In New York first cousins can get married, my father married his first cousin. So now we legalized same sex marriages and things get bad with all of these wars. So the government is forced to bring back the draft. Now what happens if my two nephews Anthony and Charles who are first cousins get married and then get a legal separation?

They are now openly gay based on their union, and they do not live together (No Sex). The one who has a job with the best benefits shares it with the other. And they use the loophole created by President Clinton, “Don’t ask and don’t tell.” But through their union they automatically told, therefore they are exempt from the draft, because openly homosexuals cannot serve in the military. But I am supposed to believe that this issue is about loving relationships? It is about benefits!

Frank Paul Gambino

Rule Number Two Contingent to Rule Number One

Rule Number Two Contingent to Rule Number One
If rule number two is not enforced there is not rule number one and therefore I can act on my own.

Question: In whose name could Janet and Jermaine marry in God or Satan?

To: The Freemasons
From: Paul
The Symbolic Wedding

I want my wedding to be symbolic of the marriage to the Church being both Jews and Gentiles. If I say I am married I am married, so this ceremony does not make anything official between me, Latoya and Janet, but it does make our Brotherhood and Sisterhood official through the vows to the unification of the Church.

I do not want the wedding to be open to the public, but it can be filmed, we have more that enough people whereby many of them will not be able to come to the ceremony. I want the Freemasons to put some thought into this ritual; it has to have true spiritual meaning and insight through physical allusions.

We can plan this ceremony into the future after all of the negotiations have taken place, you can look at my wedding as a allegiance of Brothers and Sisters under one banner and to have an allegiance, there must first be an agreement that they all can live by. “Your word is your bond.” Many are called but few are chosen!

The Brotherhood & Sisterhood
Frank Paul Gambino
No Divorce or Annulment Clause

I will take back the demand for a prenuptial agreement or mid-nuptial agreement; I admit I probably made them into a couple of nut cases. However, I do demand a “No Divorce or Annulment Clause.” The reason I wanted the prenuptial agreement is because Janet told me during the Integration that if she got tired of me, she would mistreat me to the point that I want her to leave. So they will always be under my budget, but if they team up on me to mistreat me, I will just assume to find a concubine of something. They will never get out of this marriage. I will always provide for them and love them, but they cannot systematically mistreat me, because they know that they can.

To: President George W. Bush & the United States Congress
From: Frank Paul Gambino
RE: Opening Statement to Final Settlement Request
Date 6 October 2007

This is the foundation of what I want for myself, my family and my men. I wrote this around 22 August 2006. I think the best time to get serious about the negotiations is after I go home. I do not want to chance us finding another excuse for me to stay away from my wives. Once I go home we will get a KEY and get the information I am not conscious of, there should be a lot of numbers and information tuck away in my mind, that will require a KEY to get to it.

I do not want a bunch of liquid capital; I want my money invested into the economy. By printing more money the value of the dollar will go down and the price of American goods will become more competitive. Buy American will make economic sense!

NOTE: Printing money is unnecessary we will actually be giving money back to the government

I get a Presidential Pardon before we release cures to diseases & other Technologies:

Updated: 11 July 2007:

Business Handlers
#1: I and My Administration
#2: Freemasons Board
#3: The Knights of Columbus Board
#4: Heads of the Five Families of New York – The Commission
#5: Queensbridge – The Jones Family is the sixth family called the Gallo Family
#6: Crips & Bloods Board under one Banner – The Freemasons
#6: Board of Clergymen Leaders
#7: Lawyers & Paralegals ($10 billion Legal Fees Fund) – Help people being released from prison and establish estates
#8: Accounting Firms
#9: Business Management Firms


Western Corporation
#1: Lending Institution
#2: Insurance Company
#3: Land (Farms and Agriculture)
#4: Construction Companies
#5: Trucking Companies
#6: Warehouses
#7: Supermarkets
#8: Packing Plant
#9: Sugar, Salt and Flour Production Plant

Media and Entertainment
#1: Paramount Pictures (Pictures)
#2: Warner Music Group & EMI or Paramount Music (Music)
#3: Warren Communications (Newspapers) will expand
#4: Clear Channel Communications
#5: Casinos & OTB (Gambling) will make profitable
#6: New York Knickerbockers (Added to List) for the kids
#7: Cable Companies (Added to List)
#8: Control of Hotels in New York City / Legalized Casio Gambling will give men something constructive to do.

Energy and Transportation
#1: Oil Company (Energy) will develop an alternative form of energy and our cars will be designed to use it.
#2: Heavy Stock in General Motors (Auto) will design cars for them
#3: Car Dealerships (Added to List)

Additional
#1: Undeveloped Land (For Real Estate & Wood)
#2: Gambino Research Facility (Technology & Pharmaceuticals) (25%)
#3: Federal Prison: Located in Florida
#4: Federalized Crips: Former members of Covert Operations and Elite Units

Arrangements

If people break the rules, I figure we can just send out the Federal Crips and put them in prison, until they get it right.

From here they can just select businesses they want to get into. I think this is a very good foundation.

RE: Settlement

The settlement is $1 Trillion. My cut is $100 Billion. I will use this to settle with my family, friends and certain organizations. If Bill Gates can have this kind of money so can I. I will disperse about $50 Billion to all parties. I will use the $900 Billion to settle everyone else. I will settle with the African Americans (Jews or Zulus) that I see eye to eye with; the rest can fight for their reparations, I do not care. Also, I will settle with the Gentiles. Basically I will settle with the Church, being those who will support our cause, whom are true Jews if they are chosen. I think this is a fair deal, considering Iraq!

The way I see it, I will have about $425 Billion to $450 Billion after I take care of my men and women, to settle with the church. Those who are called Jews as far as I am concerned are actually Gentiles, but if they insist on being Jews so be it, because I will treat all members of the church the same way. In the same way I will establish a bank to settle with my men; I will also establish a bank for them.

My annual budget will be based on the interest payments of my total assets, which will be 20%; this will allow me to support the economy instead of trying to monopolize it. Plus I want 25% of the profits made by the Gambino Enterprises, being the two research divisions. The other 75% will go to share holders. I will pay taxes on my income and then do charity with the balance minus the rate of inflation which will accumulate into my estate to maintain the actual value of my assets. My settlement is after taxes, it does not make sense to print the money to tax me, you figure out what the taxes is and add to the settlement. Everyone else will pay their taxes out of the settlement.

Lending Power: $9 Trillion

#1: Frank Paul Jones
#2: Paul Castellano
#3: Frank Paul Gotti
#4: Frank Paul Gambino
#5: Capstone Zulu
#6: King Jesus Paul Solomon
#7: Name not to be announced to Public – Take a wild Guess!

http://technorati.com/search/Frank+Paul+Gambino?authority=a4&language=en