Ban on Gay Marriage

To: The Brotherhood & Sisterhood
From: Frank Paul Gambino
RE: Ban on Gay Marriage
Date: 1 June 2007
Date: 26 January 2008
Date: 21 February 2008

I think that a ban on homosexual marriage is a priority, not because of morals, but because of the economic factors.

The way I understand things as far as marriage is concerned, is that whatever you believe in, you are married to. I believe when the Apostle Paul said that he wanted to present you like virgins to the Lord (unmarried), he was talking about preconceived notions. He was talking about religion. He did not want his flock to be married to possibly falsehoods, and he wanted them to be open to ideas that may be the intentions of the Lord. In other words, he did not want his flock to have preconceived notions about what was the Lords will.

If a person is a homosexual and they believe in homosexuality, they are already married to this concept. The piece of paper that makes government recognition of this union, does not make them anymore married then they already are. A marriage license only means that the government recognizes the union. This cannot happen for economic reasons.

We are in a situation whereby the government wants to overhaul the Social Security System. Probably in the near future the age of retirement will go up. When the Social Security System was first designed there were about 5 or 6 people working for everyone on Social Security. If my understanding is correct, by around 2020 there will be more like 2 or 3 people working for everyone on Social Security. The Social Security System is basically a pyramid scheme and for it to continue to work, the average worker will have to be much more productive than those who work today. People will have to do what it once took 6 people to do through technology, to supply the masses with supplies and to take care of the elderly.

If homosexual marriages are recognized by the government it will destroy the Social Security System. It will be like every other homosexual will be eligible for Social Security because their homosexual partner died from AIDS. It is for this reason that I think the Ban on Gay Marriages is a National Priority. Our Nations financial stability is on the line.

RE: Slipping Through the Cracks

I believe the nation is being side tracked and people are taking advantage of it. The shape of the United Supreme Court was reshaped without much media attention or politicians being vocal about it. Now the homosexual community is trying to slip through the cracks with their agenda, while the nation is at war and the economy is uncertain.

The real argument from the homosexual community is that they want government benefits in the same way as heterosexual couples. The issue is not about loving relationships, as it is being presented, it is about health benefits, other benefits and social security.

I think a lot of things should be addressed concurrently with this issue. I do not hear homosexuals fighting for their rights to defend our country openly as homosexuals in the military. They want the same benefits as those who fight and die for our nation, but do not want the right to be a part of that group. The trend of the media is that President Bush is dealing with an issue that is not as important as the gas prices and the war in Iraq. But the media does not mention that the homosexual community is raising the issue at this time. In other words we are supposed to just be sidetracked with all the other problems of the world and ignore these defenseless homosexuals. I do not think so! If they find it timely to raise the issue of “Gay Rights,” I believe the county should respond to this.

I do not think they deserve the right to have the government recognize their same sex unions. Maybe I will change my mind, when they fight to have a Gay Brigade in the United States Military. Maybe I will change my mind when as openly homosexuals they serve in the front line along side with the many men and women who serve and die and get injured in war. I think the media is pro-homosexual and the fight against homosexual marriage is an economic factor that cannot be ignored. If the media wants the United States to deal with what they think are the important issues, then they should tell the homosexuals to put their agenda on the backburner until the nation can have time to properly address the issues. I do not think the nation should be sidetracked with so called important issues, and ignore the homosexual agenda, that is not about loving relationships, but is about government benefits for a diseased ridden community, because of their sexual behavior.

I heard a homosexual couple say that what President Bush is doing is un-Christian, as to say their relationship is. This is the kind of mess the media is presenting to the general public. The American Citizens are being brainwashed into believing that this issue is about something that it not about. It is not about love, it is about benefits and economics and the economy is on the top of the agenda. I wish President Bush would be honest and straightforward with the American people, and tell it like it is the government cannot afford to condone homosexuality, because it would break the bank.

RE: Same Sex Marriage Scenario

This is what is on the line with same sex marriages. In New York first cousins can get married, my father married his first cousin. So now we legalized same sex marriages and things get bad with all of these wars. So the government is forced to bring back the draft. Now what happens if my two nephews Anthony and Charles who are first cousins get married and then get a legal separation?

They are now openly gay based on their union, and they do not live together (No Sex). The one who has a job with the best benefits shares it with the other. And they use the loophole created by President Clinton, “Don’t ask and don’t tell.” But through their union they automatically told, therefore they are exempt from the draft, because openly homosexuals cannot serve in the military. But I am supposed to believe that this issue is about loving relationships? It is about benefits!

Frank Paul Gambino